Should i use primal strike

Also Ultos is one of those early sets that sucks to work with trying to play resist tetris. But hey, you get blue text with the mythical set! Not bad at all, but meh. And the only other blue text enhancer to Primal Strike requires breaking the set. I seriously almost started a thread the other day to ask if a Primal Strike Shaman bit the devs when they were children, because Ultos was always a clunky set to work with and comes across as very weak as a mythic set.

Guess what has a 2. Windfury Weapon : your next windfury proc generates 5 stacks of maelstrom weapon. Flametongue weapon: your next flame shock will not incur a cooldown or increase the damage of lava burst by an amount equal to your critical strike chance. I personally think blizzard should consider upgrading primal strike or change the spell In some other way, as it is right now no one is going to bother to add this to their action bar.

The same could be said for flametongue and I fear blizzard might just add spell power to it just to make it useful instead of giving it some gameplay element to it. Had no problems clearing the zone. At level 10, I went enhancement, put Windfury on the 2h Warden staff and kept going with primal strike. Was tons of fun. Losing other abilities due to level also sucked. It needs to go. It does 87 damage at level Flametongue does 15 damage.

These are absolutely useless abilities. Classic TBC. Quick Facts. Comments Comment by mikolaj73 No cooldown? Comment by If this is supposed to be an inferior Stormstrike, why not give it a similar, weaker effect? It still wouldn't make it part of the Elemental rotation, but at least it'd be a not completely useless ability. Comment by WookieWalker Primal Strike's damage is dependent on weapon damage, but not in a multiplicative manner. It adds additional damage to whatever your weapon damage is.